<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04266nam a2200193Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">28097</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">28097</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220329105410.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140128s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">640</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">SWA/ST</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Swati Sarabhai</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Standardisation and quality evaluation of rice based fermented dairy products</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Vellanikkara</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Department of Home Science, College of Horticulture</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2012</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">94</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">MSc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The present study was undertaken to standardise rice based fermented dairy 
products and to enrich the standardised products with bits and pulp of fruits. The 
study also envisaged to evaluate the physical, chemical, nutritional, organoleptic and 
keeping qualities of the standardised products. 
Rice based fermented dairy products (RBFDP) were prepared using rice 
slurry made out of roasted and unroasted rice flour of raw rice, parboiled rice and 
germinated rice in different proportions with or without milk. With a view to find out 
the most appropriate combination for the preparation of RBFDP, the 18 treatments 
were evaluated for various organoleptic qualities like appearance, colour, flavour, 
odour, texture, taste, after taste and overall acceptability and compared with the 
characteristics of plain yoghurt (control). In different treatments tried for the 
preparation of RBFDP, the mean scores for different quality attributes showed a 
decreasing trend with increase in the quantity of rice slurry. The products prepared 
with milk and rice slurry made out of unroasted flour of raw, parboiled and 
germinated rice in 50:50 proportions were selected as the most acceptable treatments 
for the preparation ofRBFDP. 
The selected RBFDP was enriched with bits and pulp of pineapple and mango 
separately @ five per cent. Based on the organoleptic scores, RBFDP prepared out of 
unroasted flour of germinated rice enriched with bits of pineapple and RBFDP 
prepared from unroasted flour of raw rice enriched with pulp of mango were selected 
as the most acceptable ones. 
The selected RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP along with control were 
stored for 14 days under refrigerated condition (4&#xB0;C) and evaluated for nutritional 
qualities initially and at the end of 14th day of storage. The physical, chemical and 
 
microbial qualities of the selected products were evaluated initially and at weekly 
intervals. 
A significant decrease was noticed in protein, fat and starch content of 
RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP during storage. Enrichment with fruits improved 
the fibre p-carotene and vitamin C content of RBFDP. The products were found to be 
a fair source of thiamine and riboflavin. The products had appreciable amounts of 
calcium and phosphorus which decreased significantly during storage 
A decrease in the curd tension and a subsequent increase in viscosity of the 
RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP was recorded in seven days of storage. By 14th 
day of storage the curd tension increased and the later remained unchanged. Syneresis 
was noticed only during the initial evaluation. 
The moisture content and pH of RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP decreased 
during storage with an increase in the titrable acidity thereby influencing the 
organoleptic qualities of the products. An increase in the total soluble solids CTSS) of 
RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP was noticed during storage whereas a decrease 
was observed in plain yoghurt (control) 
Presence of contaminating bacteria was not detected in any of the samples 
during storage. Mold and yeast were not' detected in the products till 7th day of 
storage. But in fruit enriched RBFDP presence of mold and yeast were detected 
during final evaluation. Viable count of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp bulgaricus and 
Streptococcus salivarius ssp thermophilus decreased in 14 days of storage. The viable 
count of cultures noticed in RBFDP made out of germinated rice was comparable 
with control. 
Cost of production of RBFDP and fruit enriched RBFDP was found to be 
lower than the cost of plain yogurt and fruit enriched yogurt available in the market. 

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Suman K T (Guide)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810105791</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESES</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">640 SWA/ST</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">173158</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2014-03-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
