<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Modeling crop water stress index (cwsi) in tree seedlings</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Sneha C</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>A V Santhosh Kumar(Guide)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xxu</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Vellanikkara</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Department of Tree Physiology and Breeding,College of Forestry</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2011</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">eng</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
    <extent>74</extent>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The research work on 'Modeling crop water stress index (CWSl) in tree 
seedlings' was taken up at Department of Tree Physiology and Breeding, College of 
Forestry during April 2010 to March 2011. 
The objective of the study was to detect water stress in seedlings of teak and 
mahogany with the help of infrared thermometry by developing CWSI. Six month old 
seedlings were provided with four different irrigation treatments- irrigation at 
lW/ET=l, 0.6 and 0.3 on weekly interval and a control treatment was maintained 
with no irrigation (IWIET=O). Plant canopy temperature was recorded on daily basis 
from each treatment using a hand held infrared therinometer (HTC lR-8811). The 
non-water-stressed baseline (NWSB), obtained from canopy air temperature deficit 
and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) in the well watered treatment (irrigation at 1.0 
lW/ET) and water stressed baseline obtained from non irrigated lW/ET=O. For teak 
the lower baseline was determined as CATD = -1.01VPD+2.8 and the upper baseline 
equation was CATD = -O.OSVPD+S.1. For mahogany, lower baseline equation was 
CATD = -0.2SVPD-2.9 and the upper baseline equation was CATD = -0.01 VPD+6.1. 
CWSl was calculated for each treatment using these baseline equations. The CWSl 
responded to irrigation events along the whole season, and clearly detected mild 
water stress, suggesting extreme sensitivity to variations in plant water status. Non 
irrigated lW IET=O showed a greater value for CWSl for all the time followed by 
treatment provided with irrigation at lW IET=O.3 while the treatments with higher 
irrigation levels (IWIET= 1 and 0.6) had lower CWSl values. It indicates that there is 
an increase in CWSl with time as available water in the soil decreased. It has been 
observed during the study that teak seedlings are more susceptible to water stress than 
mahogany. Observation on canopy air temperature deficit showed that, teak seedlings 
from all treatments maintained a constant canopy air temperature deficit all over the 
week. In mahogany, lWIET=l and lWIET=O maintained a constant canopy air 
temperature deficit, whereas, lW/ET=0.6 and lW/ET=0.3 showed a slow increase 
 
prior to the next irrigation. This reveals a relatively higher water use of teak seedlings 
when compared to mahogany. 
Well watered mahogany seedlings showed higher crude protein content 
compared to other treatments indicating a significant reduction in photosynthesis 
occurred during water stress. But for teak seedlings no difference was observed 
among different treatments. Chlorophyll content was found to be decreasing due to 
water stress in both species. Teak seedlings showed significant reduction in total 
height, collar diameter, number of leaves, shoot weight, root weight, shoot root length 
ratio and relative growth rate on the course of stress treatment whereas root length 
was increasing. Shoot root biomass ratio was found to be least affected due to 
different levels of irrigation treatment. In the case of mahogany, collar diameter, 
shoot root length ratio and relative growth rate were found to be decreasing due to 
water stress. Root length was found to be increasing due to water stress. Plants were 
able to maintain total height, total leaf number, shoot weight, root weight and shoot 
root biomass ratio unaffected even under irrigation at IWIET=O.3 also. Comparison 
on growth characteristics and physiological parameters of two species- teak and 
mahogany by providing different levels of irrigation revealed that mahogany uses 
water more efficiently than teak seedlings. The present series of investigations 
indicate the scope of CWSI in early detection of crop water stress. As is easy to find 
out and less time consuming, CWSI has got an immense potential in irrigation 
scheduling as well as water management. 
</abstract>
  <note>MSc</note>
  <classification authority="ddc">634.9 SNE/MO</classification>
  <identifier type="uri">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810028921</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810028921</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">150131</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20220328154440.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
