<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Major predators in rice ecosystems and their potential in rice pest management</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Premila K S</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nalinakumari T (Guide)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Vellayani</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2003</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">9999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">und</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Survey conducted in three heterogeneous rice ecosystems of Kerala 
viz., Kuttanadu rice fields of Alappuzha district with high load of pesticide, 
double cropped rice fields of Thiruvananthapuram district with moderate 
level of pesticide and Pokkali rice fields of Ernakulam district with no 
pesticide during two consecutive seasons at the vegetative, tillering and 
reproductive stages of the crop revealed a distinct change in the 
composition and status of natural enemies and pests in rice ecosystem. 
While pests dominated in Kuttanadu and double cropped rice fields 
of Thiruvananthapuram, natural enerm es dominated In Pokkali 
ecosystem. Among the natural enemies, population of predators was 
signi ficantly higher 111 all the three ecosystems. Population of 
pnr as lt o i d s was very low. Among the predators, insect predators 
dominated the predator fauna followed by the spiders in the three 
ecosystems. The important insect predators observed were the mirid 
bug Cyrtorhinus livi dipennis Reuter and the coccinellid beetle 
Micraspis di scol or (Fabricius) and the major spider predators recorded 
were Tetragnatho maxillosa Thorell and Lycosa pseudoannulata 
(Boesenberg et Strand). 
Among the pests seen in th~ three ecosystems, the sucking pests 
were dominant followed by the defoliators. Stage specific sucking 
pests like the ricebug Lept ocorisa acut a (Thunb) and earhead thrips 
Hapl ot hrips ganglb aueri Schmutz too were seen infesting the crop 
during the respective crop stages. Hoppers were the predominant 
sucking pests in all the three rice ecosystems. Population of other 
sucking pests was very low. Among the hoppers Nephot ettix sp. and 
Sogatella furcifera (Horvath) were predominant. Comparatively, 
population of the brown planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stal) was 
 
low. Population of other pests considered as major ones in the State 
like yellow stem borer Scirpophaga incertulas (Walker), gall fly 
Orseolia oryzae (Wood-Mason), case worm Parapoynx stagnalis Zeller 
etc. was negligible. 
The population of neutrals was low in all the three rice 
ecosystems. On the other hand, high population of these 'other insects' 
was seen in the adjoining vegetation. 
Greater diversity of arthropod spec ies was observed in the 
insecticide-free Pokkali rice ecosystem and insecticide-rationally-used 
double cropped rice ecosystem of Thiruvananthapuram. Less diversity 
of species was seen in Kuttanadu rice ecosystem where insecticides 
were applied indiscriminately. 
Studies on the suitability of different prey for mass culturing 
C. l ivi dip enni s, M. discolor, T. maxillosa and L. pseudoannulata under 
controlled conditions indicated that the best prey for C. lividipennis 
was the first instar nymphs of N. I ugens ,for M. discol or its eggs, for 
T. maxillosa, Nephotettix sp. and for L. pseudoannul at a, N. lugens. 
Efficiency of the predators 111 suppressing hopper pests when 
assessed in terms of searching capacity, feeding potential, prey 
preference and hyperpredation revealed that the insect predators 
C. lividipennis and M. discolor showed better ability to search for plant 
hoppers, especially N. lugens and S. furcifera. Comparatively, the 
searching capacity of the spiders for hoppers was low. The feeding 
potential and prey preference of C. livi dipenni s was significantly high 
for first instar nymphs of N. l ugens . Similarly, M. discolor preferred 
more of its own eggs than the other prey tested. The spider, 
L. ps eu do annul at a was observed to be a significantly better predator of 
 
hoppers than T. maxill os a. None of the predators tested showed 
cannibalism. Hyperpredatory activity was observed in Crocothemis sp., 
Agri ocne mis sp., Polytoxus fuscovitt at us (Stal), T. maxillosa, Oxyopes 
sp. and L. pseudoannulata. The mirid bug C. lividipennis was a highly 
preferred prey for hyperpredation. 
The commonly used insecticides for nee pest control 
viz., carbaryl, phosphamidon, monocrotophos, quinalphos and methyl 
parathion caused 80 to 100 per cent mortality of predators at the dose 
normally recommended for pest control. 
The results of the study emphasized the need for periodical 
assessment of the arthropod community Jl1 nee ecosystems as agro- 
ecological conditions tend to shift the status of phytophages and 
entomophages from time to time. Based on the results, growing of 
varieties tolerant to major pests and regulation of incident pests by 
conserving naturally occurring predators through optimal habitat 
modification and use of predator-friendly insecticides when absolutely 
needed will go a long way in sustainable production of rice in Kerala. 
</abstract>
  <note>PhD </note>
  <classification authority="ddc">632.6 PRE/MA</classification>
  <identifier type="uri">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810015054</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810015054</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">140128</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20220928130058.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
