<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02716nam a2200181Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">26980</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">26980</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220901140523.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140128s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">632.6</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">REJ/MA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Reji G V </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Management Of The American Serpentine Leaf Miner Liriomyza Trifolii (Burgess) Dietars On Cowpea,vigna Unguiculata(L.) Walp</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a"> Vellayani</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">MSc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Survey conducted in Kailiyoor panchayat of Thiruvananthapuram 
district revealed that Liriomyza trifol ii caused maximum damage to 
cowpea at the reproductive phase of the crop III summer. Raising 
susceptible varieties, applying high doses of nitrogen and frequent use of 
insecticides were noted to intensify the pest incidence. The weeds, 
Achyranthus aspera, Amaranthus viridis, Cleome viscosa, Cleome 
monophylfa, Heliotropium indicum, Physalis minima and Desmodium 
gyrans were identified as host plants of the pest. Seven larval parasitoids 
were recorded of which Chrysonotomyia rexia and Asecodes sp. were 
predominant. 
Twenty accessions of ccwpea including trailing and bush types 
were screened in the laboratory for resistance to L. trifolii. Accessions 
of trailing type were more susceptible to the pest. VU-12 was least 
susceptible among the trailing type while Sharika and Vyjayanthi were 
highly susceptible. Among the bush type, VU-4, VU-6, VU-3 and Arka 
Garima were less susceptible. 
Four plant oils and four synthetic insecticides when evaluated in 
the laboratory at two doses along with neem oil (2.5 per cent) and 
dimethoate (0.05 per cent) showed no significant diffe. ence in efficacy 
between the doses. Neem oil, marotti oil and ilIupai oil at 2.5 per cent 
and abamectin, 0.003 per cent, thiamethoxam, 0.02 per cent and 
profenophos, 0.025 per cent were found to be effective in controlling the 
pest. 
All the treatments reduced the pest infestation significantly in the 
field. Abamectin, 0.003 per cent was significantly superior. Neem oil, 
marotti oil and illupai oil 2.5 per cent also reduced pest infestation. 
Considering the cost and safety to the natural enemies, the oils were 
found more advantageous to the farmers. 
 
Based on the results, cultivation of the tolerant accession VU -12 
111 endemic areas, destruction of weed host plants, judicious application 
of nitrogen and need based application of neem oil / marotti oil / illupai 
oil at 2.5 per cent can be recommended for inclusion in rPM strategies of 
L. trifolii. 

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Hebsy Bai (Guide)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810105636</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESES</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">632.6 REJ/MA</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">172039</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2014-03-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
