<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02893nam a2200181Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">26847</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">26847</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220830151944.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140128s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">636.089 4</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">BIP?SE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Bipin K C </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Seroconversion of three different foot-and-mouth disease vaccines in cattle</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mannuthy</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Department of Veterinary Epidemology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2001</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">MVSc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Seroconversion of three different commercial inactivated quadrivalent 
Foot-and-Mouth disease vaccines were studied. One aluminium hydroxide gel 
vaccine and two oil-adjuvanted vaccines were used for the study in three groups 
of cattle. Monthly assessment of antibody titres against 0, A, C and Asia-I 
antigens were made by liquid phase blocking-ELlS A (LPB-ELISA). 
Unvaccinated calves of four months and above age were grouped into three and 
vaccinations were made as per manufacturer's regime. 
Group I and group Il animals did not showed significant difference in 
type &#xB0; antibody titres throughout the study period except following booster 
vaccination of group I in seventh month. Both groups maintained protective 
titres except in the fourth and fifth months of study. Group III showed a lower 
level of antibody titres throughout the study period. 
Protective typeA antibody titres were maintained by group I and group 
H animals during the entire study period except in the fifth month. No 
significant difference between these two groups observed except following the 
second booster vaccination in group H. Group III showed comparatively lower 
antibody titres against type A FMD antigen. 
" 
 
All the three groups showed protective mean type C antibody titres 
throughout the study period. But group III showed an antibody titre below 
protective level during fourth month. Group I and group II did not show 
significant variation in antibody titres except following respective booster 
vaccinations. 
Group I and group II maintained a protective level of type Asia-l 
antibody titres except during fifth month. Group III showed significantly low 
Asia-l antibody titres throughout the study period. 
The booster vaccinations produced anamnestic response in group I and 
group Il in almost all cases. Group III animals showed lower antibody titres 
against all the four virus types when compared to group I and group Il and 
response to booster vaccinations were poor in group Ill. 
Comparison between the three vaccines in terms of cost required for 
immunising a single animal for the first one year revealed that oil-adjuvanted 
vaccine Il required the lowest cost while oil-adjuvanted vaccine III required the 
highest cost for the first one year. 

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Tresamol PV (Guide)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810105593</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESES</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">636.089 4 BIP?SE</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">171906</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2014-03-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
