<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>06927nam a2200181Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">26685</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">26685</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220829114709.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140128s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">332</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">DEV/CO</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Devika Mangsatabam </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Comparative analysis of the performance of Kerala based banks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Vellanikkara</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Department of Rural Banking and Finance Management, College of Co-operation, Banking and Management</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2002</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">MSc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The study entitled "A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF 
THE PERFORMANCE OF KERALA BASED BANKS" was conducted 
with the following objectives . 
. 
i)	To analyse the performance of Kerala based public, private 
and co-operative sector banks. 
ii) To compare the relative efficiency of these banks and 
iii) To examine the role of these banks in agricultural lending. 
The study was conducted in six out of the 10 Kerala 
based banks comprising of the State Bank of Tranvancore (SBT) 
and South Malabar Gramin Bank (SMBG) in the public sector, 
South Indian Bank (SIB), Dhanalakshmi Bank (DB) and Catholic 
Syrian Bank (CSB) in the private sector, and Kerala State Co- 
operative Bank (KSCB) in the co-operative sector. 
The study was conducted for a period of six years from 
1994-95 to 1999-00 using mainly secondary data made available 
from the Annual Reports of the banks concerned. The first and 
second objectives of analysing the performance of Kerala based 
public private and co-operative sector banks and comparison of the 
relative efficiency of these banks have been done by using three 
models viz., Return On Equity (ROE) Decomposition Analysis, 
Weighted Productivity Index and Market Share Concept. For 
 

-- 
 
assessing the efficiency of each bank using the Market Share 
Concept, data were collected from all the 10 banks. Data 
pertaining to agricultural lending were also collected from the 
concerned banks' head office for analysing the third objective. 
Based on the above indicators, individual performance of the banks 
were assessed and a Composite Index was developed to rank these 
banks. 
The study has revealed that CD ratio has been 
declining for all the Kerala based banks except SMGB. For all 
these banks, the rate of increase in advances has not been as high 
as that of deposits which might be due to diversion of deposits by 
banks like investment in government and other approved 
securities, shares and debentures. 
The analysis of the profitability and productivity of 
Kerala based banks on the basis of ROE Decomposition Analysis 
has revealed that KSCB'is the only bank which could not achieve 
the 16-20 per cent internationally accepted ROE and one per cent 
ROA. SMGB has performed well showing a continuous increase in 
ROE and ROA except in 1996-97 when these values were negative 
due to implementation of NPA norms. 
When compared to the national average, it was found 
that the performance of all the Kerala based banks except KSCB 
 
was better with respect to the three indicators viz., ROE, ROA and 
Equity Multiplier (EM). 
The Profit Margin (PM) of the Kerala based banks 
except for SMGB has been lower than the industry average which 
might be due to the fact that their income has been adversely 
affected by the high interest expended on deposits. 
The study has also revealed that interest expended on 
deposits for SMGB has been very low when compared to the other 
Kerala. based banks since the Bank had other sources of funds like 
refinance from sponsoring bank and other institutions. The 
percentage share of Provisions and Contingencies (P&amp;C) to the 
total revenue has been found to be very low in the case of KSCB 
and S.rvlGB pointing to the lower NPAs in these two banks. 
Among the Kerala based banks, only SMGB could 
achieve the internationally accepted criteria of having a Net 
Interest Margin (NIM) of three per cent and above. However, the 
burden of this particular bank has been observed to be very high 
since its non-interest income is negligible. 
Analysis based on the Weighted Productivity Index 
(WPi) has revealed that KSCB achieved the highest performance in 
Employee Productivity (EPi), while SMGB had the lowest 
 

I 
 
Employee Productivity (EPi). The low staff productivity of SMGB 
might be due to drastic increase in wage bill as the implementation 
of the Award of the National Industrial Tribunal (NIT) gave pay 
parity in RRBs. 
The high Capital Productivity (CPi) of SMGB may be 
attributed to an increase in interest income and reduction in 
NPAs. The~e has been a general decline in CPi of the private sector 
banks - DB, SIB and CSB due to the higher provisioning for NP As. 
The market share of the branches, staff, non-deposit 
working funds and advances of the six Kerala based banks to the 
total of 10 banks has declined during the period of study. This may 
be attributed to the increase in the share of other Kerala based 
banks not included in the study like Federal Bank, Lord Krishna 
Bank and N edungadi Bank. 
The market share of SBT in branches, deposits, non- 
wage operating expenses and interest spread has declined 
consistently during the study period reflecting its declining 
prominence as the premier bank in the State. 
In the estimation of the efficiency level of Kerala based 
banks on Market Share Concept, it has been found that KSCB 
obtained the highest score followed by SBT and DB. SMGB, which 
 
	
had performed well in the other two models, performed the lowest 
as per this model. This may be attributed to the high share of 
branches and staff among its inputs factors. Besides fluctuation in 
output factors like non-interest income and the negative net 
profits in the 1996-97 have adversely affected its performance. 
Although the introduction of financial sector reforms 
has led to decline in priority sector lending in general, the 
liberalisation of the term 'priority sector' since 1997 has enabled 
banks to achieve the target of 40 per cent. The actual 
disbursement of credit to priority by Kerala based banks has never 
crossed the target of 40 per cent except in the case of SMGB. 
SMGB is the only bank, which has been increasing its 
percentage share of lending to the priority sector and agriculture 
in spite of its increased lending to the Non-Target Group over the 
years. 
The computation of the Composite Index to assess the 
overall performance of Kerala based banks has revealed that 
SMGB obtained the highest score followed by KSCB. The lower 
performance of SBT and private sector banks may be attributed to 
lower ROE, EPi, CPi, and ultimately WPi, lower efficiency based 
on market share and low share of agricultural advances to total 
	advances. 	~ 

</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Molly Joseph (Guide)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810104442</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESES</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">332 DEV/CO</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">171744</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2014-03-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
