<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Techno-socio-economic consequencies of national watershed development project for rainfed areas in Thiruvananthapuram district</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Lakshmi S</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Balakrishna Pillai G (Guide)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Vellayani</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Department of Agricultural Extension, College of Agriculture</publisher>
    <dateIssued>2000</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">9999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">und</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>The study entitled "Techno-socio-economic consequences 
of NWDPRA in Thiruvananthapuram district" was undertaken tc 
assess the techno-socio-economic consequences on beneficiaries 
due to the implementation of NWDPRA. An attempt was also made 
to identify the constraints perceived by the farmers and 
extension agents. 
The study was conducted in the four watersheds, one 
from each t a l u k of Thiruvananthapuram district which was 
selected randomly. A sample of hundred beneficiaries was 
selected according to the probability proportional to size of 
the beneficiaries in the selected watershed areas. Data were 
collected through well structured and pretested i n t e r v i e v 
schedule. 
The study revealed the following: 
Majority of the farmers had small land holdings. Most 
of the farmers received only medium level of technical 
guidance. 
The percept ions of the major i t y of respondents about 
the availability of low cost watershed technologies, 
observability of the innovation and complexity of the 
innovation were medium. 
 
About three-fourths of the farmers had a favourable 
attitude towards watershed development programmes. Most of the 
farmers had medium level of extension participation, mass media 
exposure and economic motivation. 
More than half of the respondents did not attend any 
training programme related to watershed management. 
More than half of the respondents had only medium 
I eve 1 0 f k now led g e i n wa t e r s he d p 1 ann i n g , i nn 0 vat i v e n e ss, 
indebtedness and orientation towards incentives. 
Majority of the farmers followed medium level of 
cropping intensity. 
The adoption of the watershed management practices by 
	the farmers was only at medium level. 	Social status of the 
farmers was on average level. 
The perception of the farmers about the employment 
generated was low and the perception about the increase in 
resource use efficiency was medium. 
About half of the respondents were of the perception 
that the increase in income and productivity was low on account 
of NWDPRA. 
Farm size, availability of low cost watershed 
technologies, observabiiity of the innovation, attitude towards 
 
watershed development programmes, extension participation, mass 
media exposure, training participation, knowledge in w~tershed 
planning and cropping intensity had positive and significant 
association with adoption of watershed management practices. 
Complexity of innovation and indebtedness had negative 
association with adoption. 
Social status of farmers had positive association with 
farm size, technical guidarice, availability of low cost 
watershed technologies, observabi 1 i t y of innovat ion, at t i tude 
towards watershed development programmes, extension 
participation, training participation, knowledge in watershed 
planning, innovativeness and orientation towards incentives. 
Indebtedness had negative association with social status of 
farmers. 
Employment generation had positive and significant 
relationship with indebtedness and orientation towards 
incentives. 
Farm size, technical guidance, availability of low 
cost watershed technologies, observability of the innovation, 
attitude towards watershed development programmes, extension 
participation, training participation and knowledge in 
watershed planning had positive and significant relationship 
with increase in resource use efficiency. 
 
The variables farm size, availability of low cost 
watershed technologies, observability of the innovation, 
attitude towards watershed development programmes, extension 
participation, mass media exposure, economic motivation, 
knowledge in watershed planning, innovativeness and cropping 
intensity were found to have positive and significant 
relationship with increase in income. Indebtedness had a 
negative relationship with increase in income. 
Increase in productivity had a positive and 
significant relationship with farm size, availability of low 
cost watershed technologies, observability of innovation, 
at tit ude towards watershed deve lopment programmes, ex ens ion 
participation, mass media exposure, training p a r t i c i pa t i on , 
knowledge in watershed planning and cropping intensity. 
Indebtedness had a negative relationship with increase in 
productivity. ~ 
Stepwise regression analysis revealed that availa 
bility of low cost watershed technologies and farm size 
contributed to 76 per cent of variation in adoption of 
watershed management practices. 
The results of s t e pw i s e regression analysis revealed 
that the variables farm size, mass media exposure, orientation 
towards incentives, technical guidance, observability of 
innovation, innovativeness and attitude towards watershed 
 
development programmes contributed to 54 per cent of variation 
in social status of farmers. 
The important constraint perceived by the farmers was 
inadequacy of funds provided to land owners in NWDPRA and the 
important constraint perceived by the extension agent was 
inadequate co-ordination among the implementing agencies of 
NWDPRA. 
The results of Spearman's rank order correlation of 
constraints revealed that there was agreement between farmers 
and extension agents with respect to the constraints in NWDPRA. 

</abstract>
  <note>MSc</note>
  <classification authority="ddc">630.71 LAK/TE</classification>
  <identifier type="uri">http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810104152</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>http://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810104152</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">140128</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20220827144301.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
