<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<mods xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" version="3.1" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-1.xsd">
  <titleInfo>
    <title>Monitoring and management of the pest complex of Bitter Gourd (Momordica Charantia L.)</title>
  </titleInfo>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Nandakumar C</namePart>
    <role>
      <roleTerm authority="marcrelator" type="text">creator</roleTerm>
    </role>
  </name>
  <name type="personal">
    <namePart>Saradamma K (Guide)</namePart>
  </name>
  <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
  <originInfo>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="code" authority="marccountry">xx</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <place>
      <placeTerm type="text">Vellayani</placeTerm>
    </place>
    <publisher>Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture</publisher>
    <dateIssued>1999</dateIssued>
    <dateIssued encoding="marc">9999</dateIssued>
    <issuance>monographic</issuance>
  </originInfo>
  <language>
    <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b" type="code">und</languageTerm>
  </language>
  <physicalDescription>
    <form authority="marcform">print</form>
  </physicalDescription>
  <abstract>Surveys were conducted in 1995-96 among one hundred bitter gourd 
farmers in Thiruvananthapuram district. Information on the personal and socio- 
economic characteristics of the farmers was gathered. Field visits indicated that 
among the pests at flowering, the jassid, H.phycitis and leaf feeder, D. indica 
were important. At early harvest, the jassid and fruitfly B. cucurbitae were the 
major pests. Among the natural enemies observed, the potential ones were 
Cjohnsoni (parasite on Hseptima), I.scutellare, Msexmaculatus and Snubilis . 
(predators on A.gossypii). 
Mosaic was severe in 12 per cent of the plots. Sixty two per cent of the 
farmers used a combination of mechanical, cultural and chemical measures against 
pests. Most common pesticides used belonged to the organophosphate group. 
Farmers in general adopted injudicious methods of chemical control. Seventy per 
cent farmers relied on mass media and interpersonal cosmopolites for information 
on plant protection. The most important constraint perceived by farmers was the 
high cost of inputs viz., plant protection chemicals, manures and fertilizers. 
Monitoring of fruit fly incidence using Biosense stikatrap (lure) indicated 
the maximum catch at eleven weeks after sowing. Ten carbofuran smeared banana 
fruit traps (in yellow coloured coconut shell) were found to be more efficient than 
one Biosense trap in trapping the fruit fly. 
 
2 
Studies on seasonal incidence of the pests and their natural enemies from 
1995 to 1996 indicated that they were more from November '95 to April '96. 
In studies on the assessment of potential natural enemies of pests, the 
biology and efficacy of Cjohnsoni against epilachna beetle was observed. Among 
the predators viz., Iscutellare, Msexmaculatus and S.nubilis whose biology and 
feeding potential was studied, Msexmaculatus was observed as the most efficient 
predator of aphids. 
In another set of experiments, the effects of botanicals and chemical 
pesticides on pests and their natural enemies were studied. The antifeedant effect 
of botanicals on third instar Hseptima grubs indicated that neem seed oil (three 
per cent) and nimbecidine (0.40 per cent) were effective. Estimation of the 
comparative effect of chemical pesticides against the fourth instar Hseptima grubs 
showed that carbaryl and dimethoate were more effective than quinalphos and 
malathion. Toxicity studies of botanicals and chemical pesticides to 
Msexmaculatus grubs and Cjohnsoni adults as well as parasite emergence from 
treated larval! pupal Hseptima hosts indicated that botanicals were safe whereas, 
the chemicals were toxic to the natural enemies. Based on the above experiments, 
the botanicals viz., neem seed oil three per cent, nimbecidine 0.40 per cent and 
the chemical pesticides,carbaryl 0.15 per cent and dimethoate 0.05 per cent were 
selected for the pest management trial in bitter gourd. 
The reaction of five bitter gourd varieties viz., Priya, Arka Harit, Preethi, 
Priyanka and local to pests was tested in a field trial. Based on pest infestation 
and yield, Preethi was selected for the pest management trial. 
 
3 
The pest management trial was conducted for two seasons (January to 
April, 1996 and 1997). The results indicated that combination of botanical with 
chemical pesticide was the best in pest control. Based on the results the following 
recommendations were suggested as part of IPM strategies in bitter gourd. 
1. Use variety 'Preethi' (MC-84) for planting 
2.	Basal drenching of combination of nee m seed oil three per cent soap 
emulsion with either dimethoate (0.025 per cent) or carbaryl (0.075 
per cent) prior to seeding. This is recommended in areas where pests 
like pumpkin beetles are endemic. 
3. Need based application of above till fruit set to control pests. 
4. Apply fungicide (Mancozeb) to control foliar disease (downy mildew). 
5.	Monitor fruit fly incidence using lure trap. Set yellow painted coconut 
shell trap's containing carbofuran smeared banana (palayankodan) 
alternated with carbofuran poisoned ocimum I jaggery (2m spacing) 
at flowering till final harvest. 
6.	After fruit set, use (need based) a combination of neem seed oil three 
per cent soap emulsion and dimethoate 0.025 per cent. 

</abstract>
  <note>PhD </note>
  <classification authority="ddc">632.6 NAN/MO</classification>
  <identifier type="uri">https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810155033</identifier>
  <location>
    <url>https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810155033</url>
  </location>
  <recordInfo>
    <recordCreationDate encoding="marc">140128</recordCreationDate>
    <recordChangeDate encoding="iso8601">20220827134211.0</recordChangeDate>
  </recordInfo>
</mods>
