<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02836nam a2200193Ia 4500</leader>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">26212</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">26212</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="003">OSt</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20220217113241.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">140128s9999    xx            000 0 und d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">636.5</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">MUT/IN</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Muthukumar SP </subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Influence Of Cellulase Supplementation On The Performance Of Broilers Fed Low Energy Diet</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="260" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Mannuthy</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences </subfield>
    <subfield code="c">1997</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="502" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="b">MVSc</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The effects of different levels of cellulase 
supplementation viz., 0.03 and 0.06 per cent in low energy 
broiler ration on production performance and nutrient 
availability in broiler chicken were evaluated using one 
hundred and ninety two commercial one-day old broiler chicks 
for a period of eight weeks. The birds were divided into four 
dietary treatment groups viz., standard broiler ration (T1), 
low energy ration (T2), low energy ration with 0.03 per cent 
cellulase (T3) and low energy ration with 0.06 per cent 
cellulase (T4). Standard broiler ration was formulated as per 
BIS (1992) specification for broiler chicken feed. Inclusion 
of wheat bran and deoiled rice bran was made to formulate the 
low energy ration. The enzyme supplemented groups showed a 
significantly higher body weight than the standard and low 
energy diet without enzyme. The feed intake was significantly 
higher in the low energy ration without enzyme. A positive 
response was observed in feed efficiency by enzyme addition 
which was statistically significant. The feed efficiency was 
best when the level of enzyme was 0.06 per cent. A 
non-significant improvement was noticed in digestibility of 
dry matter, protein and ether extract due to enzyme 
supplementation. A significantly higher metabolisable energy 
and crude fibre digestibility was observed in enzyme added 
groups. The enzyme treatment significantly reduced the 
 
	
moisture content of the excreta. The processing yields and 
abdominal fat percentage did not show any significant 
difference among treatments. The intestinal viscosity was 
significantly lower in birds fed enzyme supplemented diets. 
Cost of production of broilers in both the cellulase 
supplemented groups was lower when compared with other groups 
fed standard control and low energy ration without enzyme. 
Based on the above findings, it can be concluded that 
cellulase supplementation in low energy diet is beneficial 
especially when low energy, less digestible agricultural 
by-products are used as feed ingredients in the chicken diet. 
</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Elizabeth V K(Guide)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810084357</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="u">https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/displaybitstream?handle=1/5810084357&amp;fileid=1d7105ff-a62b-4683-9972-9c86d45486d1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">KAUCLV</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">THESES</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">636.5 MUT/IN</subfield>
    <subfield code="p">171260</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2014-03-18 00:00:00</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2014-03-18</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">TH</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
