Normal view MARC view ISBD view

Major spiders in vegetable ecosystem and their predatory potential (Record no. 27432)

MARC details
000 -LEADER
fixed length control field	03679nam a2200193Ia 4500
003 - CONTROL NUMBER IDENTIFIER
control field	OSt
005 - DATE AND TIME OF LATEST TRANSACTION
control field	20220317144515.0
008 - FIXED-LENGTH DATA ELEMENTS--GENERAL INFORMATION
fixed length control field	140128s9999 xx 000 0 und d
082 ## - DEWEY DECIMAL CLASSIFICATION NUMBER
Classification number	632.6
Item number	MAN/MA
100 ## - MAIN ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name	Manu P Mani
245 ## - TITLE STATEMENT
Title	Major spiders in vegetable ecosystem and their predatory potential
260 ## - PUBLICATION, DISTRIBUTION, ETC. (IMPRINT)
Place of publication, distribution, etc.	Vellayani
Name of publisher, distributor, etc.	Department of Agricultural Entomology, College of Agriculture
Date of publication, distribution, etc.	2005
300 ## - PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION
Extent	104
502 ## - DISSERTATION NOTE
Degree type	MSc
520 3# - SUMMARY, ETC.
Summary, etc.	Spider faunistic survey conducted in okra, brinjal, cowpea, bittergourd and amaranthus fields in Kalliyoor panchayat of Thiruvananthapuram district during the summer of 2004, revealed the prevalence of high density and diversity of spiders in the vegetable ecosystem. Hunting spiders were dominant in all the vegetable plots. Thirty species of spiders distributed in nine families were recorded with the number of species in each vegetable field ranging from 10 to17. Among the thirty species, 16 species were commonly seen in the different vegetable fields while 14 species were seen exclusively associated with a particular vegetable.<br/> Araneidae with ten species was the most represented family in the vegetable fields followed by Oxyopidae and Salticidae. The other families observed were Miturgidae, Thomisidae, Tetragnathidae, Corinnidae, Lycosidae and Clubionidae. Most of the spiders appeared during the vegetative and flowering stages of the crop. Few spiders were recorded in the early stage of the crops.<br/> Four spiders viz., O. javanus, C. danieli, N. mukerjei and T. mandibulata were dominant in all the vegetable plots among which O. javanus and C. danieli predominated.<br/> Studies on the seasonal influence showed no significant difference in the abundance of the spiders during summer and rainy seasons. Rather, the growth stages of the crops significantly influenced the build up of the spider population with higher population being observed during the reproductive phase. <br/> In general, the spiders preferred soft bodied insects like the hemipterans, lepidopterans, dipterans and coleopterans (eggs and grubs) for predation. While the spiders did not show any significant preference for the different hemipteran prey in a mixed diet, significant difference was shown for the different lepidopteran pests. O. javanus had the maximum preference for the lepidopteran pests<br/> Chemical insecticides were more toxic to the spiders than botanicals when tested at their recommended doses. Among the chemical insecticides, dimethoate 0.05 per cent, carbaryl 0.2 per cent and malathion 0.1 per cent were highly toxic. Even at different doses the insecticides were toxic to the spiders. Quinalphos 0.05 per cent and imidacloprid were less toxic. Between the two methods of application, topical application of insecticides was more detrimental to the spiders than release on treated plants. Among the spiders, T. mandibulata was more susceptible to the insecticides followed by C. danieli. O. javanus and N. mukerjei were less sensitive. <br/><br/> While the fungal pathogens, M. anisopliae, P. lilacinus and Bt were safe to the spiders. F. pallidoroseum, Fusarium sp. and B. bassiana were pathogenic. <br/> Based on the results of the study, conservation of the spiders characteristic of the vegetable ecosystem would be a practical and ecologically and economically viable approach for pest suppression in vegetables. When there is a spurt in pest ravage, the protection afforded by the predator could be supplemented with judicious use of “spider friendly” insecticides. <br/><br/>
700 ## - ADDED ENTRY--PERSONAL NAME
Personal name	Hebsi Bai(Guide)
856 ## - ELECTRONIC LOCATION AND ACCESS
Uniform Resource Identifier	<a href="https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810157621">https://krishikosh.egranth.ac.in/handle/1/5810157621</a>
942 ## - ADDED ENTRY ELEMENTS (KOHA)
Source of classification or shelving scheme	Dewey Decimal Classification
Koha item type	Theses

Holdings
Withdrawn status	Lost status	Source of classification or shelving scheme	Damaged status	Not for loan	Home library	Current library	Shelving location	Date acquired	Total Checkouts	Full call number	Barcode	Date last seen	Price effective from	Koha item type
		Dewey Decimal Classification			KAU Central Library, Thrissur	KAU Central Library, Thrissur	Theses	18/03/2014		632.6 MAN/MA	172491	18/03/2014	18/03/2014	Theses